- Mar 24, 2014
-
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9681]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9680]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9670]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9669]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9668]]
-
- Mar 22, 2014
-
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9667]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9666]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
That way, they can at least be looked at. You won't see the intra-element details, but frequently they are not even all this important. Proper subsampling of higher-order functions is more difficult and has to wait for another day. [[Imported from SVN: r9665]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9664]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9663]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
This will be generalized to take any Lagrange basis, to allow some form of visualization for higher-order functions. [[Imported from SVN: r9662]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9661]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9660]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9659]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9658]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9657]]
-
- Mar 21, 2014
-
-
Oliver Sander authored
This prepares for a later switch to a second-order basis [[Imported from SVN: r9656]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9655]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9654]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9653]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
Use its size rather than the number of grid vertices [[Imported from SVN: r9652]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
Adjust values of the shearing/wrinkling problem to the values given in the Taylor/Bertoldi/Steigmann paper [[Imported from SVN: r9651]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
This move more than halfs the size of this file, and makes it *much* easier to understand. If we ever need the gradient code we can still recover it from the 2.3-2 branch. [[Imported from SVN: r9650]]
-
- Mar 19, 2014
-
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9649]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9648]]
-
- Jan 22, 2014
-
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9618]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9617]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9616]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9615]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9614]]
-
- Jan 09, 2014
-
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9601]]
-
- Dec 13, 2013
-
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9588]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9587]]
-
- Dec 12, 2013
-
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9586]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
Assuming that the AverageDistanceAssembler can provide it. This is for the Gram-Schmidt solver only. The old Gauss-Seidel code will still use a full matrix. [[Imported from SVN: r9585]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9584]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
viz.: field_type blocklevel operator=(scalar) [[Imported from SVN: r9583]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
[[Imported from SVN: r9582]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
CG seems to converge to quickly. If too few iterations are performed, then ADOL-C has trouble determining the correct second derivatives. Since the Gram-Schmidt solver is a direct solver, OTOH, the derivatives should be perfect. It is also faster than the Gauss-Seidel solver I was previously using. [[Imported from SVN: r9581]]
-
Oliver Sander authored
Nice, because it works for rank-deficient matrices. And still fast enough for the systems I am considering here. [[Imported from SVN: r9580]]
-